The Fame Monster: Andy Warhol, John Waters, and Art’s Obsession With Celebrity

Andy Warhol’s itself-famous statement that “in the future, everyone will be world-famous for fifteen minutes” could apply just as well to art itself.

‍Art is, in essence, a way of immortalizing (and thus potentially making famous) what happens in a fifteen-minute (or even shorter) period: the time spent posing for the flash of an image, having a mug shot blown up to the size of a mural, or filming one of Warhol’s famous screen tests. As a result, that immortality and the resulting fame become more than just a fleeting moment of favor. Instead, fame — along with its parallel, celebrity — are a resource, something that can be manipulated, interrogated, and mined for material.

‍This exists beyond Warhol, too: Plenty of artists work with a broad range of celebrities in their exploration of the idea of fame. While Justin Bieber, Joan Didion, and Charles Manson may not appear to have much in common at first glance, they’ve all been used by John Waters as material for his visual art. Waters’ work with all three follows in an artistic relationship to celebrity that has direct throughlines to Andy Warhol and continues to echo through contemporary art in the work of people like Russell Young. But where Waters has Bieber, Didion, and Manson, Warhol and Young had Marilyn Monroe.

‍But they weren’t really working with Marilyn Monroe, the person; while both artists (re)created images of Marilyn Monroe, they remained fundamentally working with her image, not her self. And the variance in their approach to Monroe (Warhol creating endless echoes of her face and lips, treating her as both flat and reproducible, while Young’s focus was more on her emotional state) suggests, too, that Monroe’s celebrity is a resource that can be drawn from at will and essentialized into components that reflect the values of the culture at large.

‍Cindy Sherman, in her Untitled Film Stills, explores the idea of fame as a kind of abstract image. The series shows Sherman in a number of performed self-portraits. Sherman’s Untitled Film Still #54 (1979) presents her as a kind of Hitchcock blonde — while she isn’t recreating the exact likeness of an actress like Kim Novak, she captures the idea of one, filtered through the performances that made her famous. Images like that and Untitled Film Still #16 (1978), in which Sherman evokes Monica Vitti in Antonioni’s La Notte, highlight both the idea that celebrity is a kind of performance and also the idea that fame is something that can be lifted from someone else and moved onto the self. This act of movement from a celebrity to the artist illustrates one of the ways in which art can challenge the idea of where celebrity comes from. While Sherman isn’t an actual ringer for Novak or Vitti, by capturing their essence in her film stills, she also captures something about the women that made them famous.

John Waters, meanwhile, takes these concepts of fame-as-resource and celebrity-as-character to a frequently grotesque extent.

‍Waters’ visual art is an attack on the idea of celebrity, the cost of fame, and the ways in which it intersects with infamy. Celebrities and media culture are often at often in the crosshairs of Waters’ visual art, from Control (2009), a sculpture of Ike pulling the strings of a puppet-like Tina Turner, to his fake celebrity tabloid Brainiac (2014), which splashes its front page with information on Joan Didion’s shocking weight gain and Phillip Roth finally dating a woman his own age, to his 2006 sculpture Playdate, in which he reimagines Michael Jackson and Charles Manson as children’s dolls. Waters’ art around celebrity drives home the point that, to him, fame and infamy really aren’t far away from each other at all. They have the same end result: people will talk about you, immortalize you in art, make movies about you. Like Warhol and Young, Warhol and Waters, beyond their shared interest in the intersections of fame and infamy, share a muse as well. Where Warhol and Young share Monroe, both Warhol and Waters have a common obsession with Jackie Kennedy. For Waters, Kennedy is a device to explore the line between performance and public persona: in Eat Your Makeup (1968), Waters and Divine recreate the Kennedy assassination with Divine playing Kennedy, while in Jackie Copies Divine’s Look (2001), a sculpture of Kennedy wearing the red dress that defined Divine’s aesthetic in Pink Flamingos.

For Warhol, meanwhile, Kennedy was representative of America in a moment of flux.

‍The Kennedy pictures in Warhol’s Death and Disaster, a series of images from before and after her husband’s assassination – presented in any order, refusing the easy narrative of happiness to grief – show the changing face of a nation writ across that of an individual. Here, Kennedy is a representative not just of herself, her husband, or a presidency, but of an entire nation. The specter of death that followed the Kennedys to Texas is literalized by John Waters in the 2014 work Grim Reaper, which sees the figure of Death from Bergman’s Seventh Seal, following the Kennedys off of a plane. Kennedy, here, like Monroe’s lips to Warhol, standing in as a symbol of something greater she represents: power, glamour, and tragedy.

The above content provided and paid for by Public and is for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute investment advice or any other kind of professional advice and should not be relied upon as such. Before taking action based on any such information, we encourage you to consult with the appropriate professionals. We do not endorse any third parties referenced within the article. Market and economic views are subject to change without notice and may be untimely when presented here. Do not infer or assume that any securities, sectors or markets described in this article were or will be profitable. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. There is a possibility of loss. Historical or hypothetical performance results are presented for illustrative purposes only.