Sign up Log in
Generated Assets

Anatomy of a Great Prompt

04/21/2026

In our early observations, we’ve found that the highest-quality Generated Assets share a common structure. Your prompt doesn’t need to be long—it needs to be clear. The more precisely you define what you want the system to look for, the more coherent and investable the output will be. Most strong prompts feature three components: a universe, a set of constraints, and a signal.

1. Universe

The universe is your starting point—the pool of stocks the AI will draw from when building your index. Defining it upfront gives the evaluation swarm a meaningful scope to work within. Without it, the system has to make assumptions, which can produce results that feel too broad or off-thesis.

Your universe can be index-based, sector-based, or defined by a characteristic. The key is that it should meaningfully narrow the field before any screening begins.

Strong universe definitions:

"Take the S&P 500..."
"Start with Nasdaq-100 technology companies..."
"Focus on US-listed small-cap industrials..."
"Look across global semiconductor manufacturers..."

Weak universe definitions:

"Good stocks..."

Too vague—the AI has no meaningful starting pool.

"Companies I've heard of..."

Not screenable, too broad.

If you don’t specify a universe, the system will default to a broad US equity universe—which works, but often produces less focused results than if you define one yourself.

2. Constraints

Constraints are your hard rules. They tell the system what to exclude or require based on quantifiable financial characteristics. Think of them as the guardrails of your thesis—they filter out companies that don’t meet your baseline criteria before the system starts looking for the qualities you actually want.

Good constraints are specific and grounded in fundamentals. The more clearly you define the financial profile you’re looking for, the more precisely the AI can screen for it.

Strong constraint language:

Revenue Growth

"Only include companies with revenue growth above 10% year-over-year"

Leverage

"Exclude companies with a debt-to-equity ratio above 1.5"

Profitability

"Require positive GAAP earnings for the last two years"

Margin Stability

"Filter out companies with declining gross margins over the past three years"

Cash Flow

"Include only companies with positive free cash flow"

Weak constraint language:

"Only good companies..."

Not a financial constraint

"No risky stocks..."

Too subjective to screen for

You can stack multiple constraints in a single prompt—the system will apply them all. Just keep each one specific enough that the AI can evaluate it against real financial data.

3. Signals

Signals are the qualitative or thematic layer of your prompt—the characteristics that define your investment thesis beyond the numbers. While constraints filter out what you don’t want, signals tell the system what you’re actively looking for. This is where your view of the market comes through.

Signals can be thematic (exposure to a trend or sector), structural (how a company is run), or behavioral (how it has performed relative to a pattern). They’re often harder to reduce to a single metric, which is exactly why the AI evaluation swarm is built to assess them.

What you can signal:

Thematic exposure

"AI infrastructure"
"onshoring supply chains"
"defense tech"

Capital efficiency

"High return on invested capital (ROIC)"

Volatility profile

"Low beta relative to the S&P 500"

Leadership Structure

"Founder-led companies"

Growth quality

"Revenue growth driven by organic expansion, not acquisitions"

Macro sensitivity

"Companies that historically outperform during rate-cutting cycles"

Strong signal language:

"Look for companies with meaningful exposure to AI infrastructure..."
"Prioritize founder-led businesses with high insider ownership..."
"Focus on companies with a track record of low volatility relative to the index..."

Weak signal language:

"Good companies in tech..."

Too generic—the signal needs a distinct characteristic to screen for

"Companies that will go up..."

not a screenable signal

Putting it all together

The most effective prompts combine all three components into a single, coherent thesis. The universe sets the scope, constraints set the floor, and signals define the character of the index you’re building.

Example:

"Take the S&P 500. Exclude high-debt companies and those with declining margins. Include firms with multi-year margin expansion, growing free cash flow, and meaningful exposure to AI infrastructure."

This structure gives the evaluation swarm a clear, coherent thesis to operationalize—a defined pool to draw from, clear rules to filter by, and a distinct investment angle to screen for. The result is an index that actually reflects your view, not just a generic basket of large-cap names.

Refining your index: The iterative loop

Once you’ve built an index, the real magic happens in the refinement loop. You can tighten constraints, strengthen signals, or reshape the universe entirely with follow-up prompts:

“Drop companies with declining EPS.”
“Narrow results to companies with consistent margin expansion.”
“Remove the top 5 megacaps to reduce concentration.”

With each iteration, you’re guiding the swarm—like directing a research team toward a sharper interpretation of your thesis.