A strong management team and sound investment process underpin Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF's Morningstar Medalist Rating of Silver. The portfolio maintains a sizable cost advantage over competitors, priced within the lowest fee quintile among peers.  

 The strategy’s management team earns an Above Average People Pillar rating. The strategy merits an Above Average Process Pillar rating.  The strategy's parent organization earns the firm an Average Parent Pillar rating. People, Process and Parent Pillar ratings for this strategy are indirectly assigned by a Morningstar analyst rather than algorithmically derived. Please see the notes following each pillar section for more details. The details of assigning methods can be found in each pillar section.

Analyst Rating

NextEra Energy

Progressive

Amazon

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. - Ordinary Shares - Class B

Marsh & McLennan

Microsoft

Procter & Gamble

Mondelez

Chubb

Oracle

Morningstar's evaluation of this security's process aims to determine the likelihood that it will outperform its Morningstar Category benchmark on a risk-adjusted basis over the long term. Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF earns an Above Average Process Pillar rating. 
 This strategy skews toward smaller, deeper value companies compared with its average peer in the Large Blend Morningstar Category. Analyzing additional factors, this strategy has consistently favored low-quality stocks compared with Morningstar Category peers over the past few years. Lacking this ballast, the fund's prospects could rest on its ability to surpass peers during economic booms. In the latest month, the strategy was also less exposed to the Quality factor compared with Morningstar Category peers. The managers have also shown an underweight risk tilt, demonstrated by lower volatility exposure over peers in recent years. These low-risk stocks are typically at their best when markets are not. Low volatility exposure contributes to limited loss on the downside at the cost of a lag in bull markets. Compared with category peers, however, the strategy had more exposure to the Volatility factor in the most recent month. Additionally, this strategy has demonstrated a bias away from momentum stocks during these years. Momentum investors tend to expect stocks that have done well recently to continue to do so in the short term. Momentum approaches can entail higher turnover and trading costs since the top stocks can often change. In recent months, the strategy also had less Momentum factor exposure than its peers. More information on a fund and its respective category's factor exposure can be found in the Factor Profile module within the Portfolio section. 

 The portfolio is overweight in financial services and healthcare relative to the category average by 5.1 and 4.8 percentage points, respectively. The sectors with low exposure compared to category peers are industrials and energy, underweight the average by 6.9 and 3.4 percentage points of assets, respectively. The strategy owns 75 securities and its assets are more dispersed than peers in the category. In particular, 26.4% of the fund’s assets are concentrated in the top 10 fund holdings, compared to the category’s 48.8% average. And in closing, in terms of portfolio turnover, looking at year-over-year movements, 24% of the fund's holdings have changed, whether through increasing, decreasing, or changing a position. 

 Note: The Process Pillar rating is indirectly assigned by an analyst. When an analyst covers a passively managed vehicle that tracks a particular index, Morningstar associates the Process Pillar rating assigned to that vehicle with the index concerned. Morningstar then maps the Process Pillar rating associated with a given index to any other uncovered passive strategies that track the same index. This ensures that the analyst’s view is leveraged whenever available and promotes consistency when assigning Process Pillar ratings to passive vehicles associated with a given index.

Above Average

Process

Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF benefits considerably from its team, earning it an Above Average People Pillar rating. There are four managers listed on the fund: Michael Jeanette, Peter Hubbard, Tony Seisser, Pratik Doshi. The team is well equipped, with an average of 12 years of portfolio management experience. Together, they manage a total of 144 strategies, with solid long-term prospects. The strategies average a Bronze asset-weighted Morningstar Medalist Rating, indicating a position to deliver positive alpha relative to the category median in aggregate. This group has successfully retained management talent, with no departures in the past five years. 

 Note: This People Pillar rating is indirectly assigned by an analyst. Morningstar analysts evaluate the People Pillar for passive products at the brand level and may also differentiate by asset class. There is at least one other passive strategy at the firm that is covered by a Morningstar analyst, so the People Pillar rating of the fund is inherited from the rating that the Morningstar analyst assigned to investment vehicles under the same brand name.

People

Invesco succeeds in a number of areas but also has its share of subpar offerings, along with many others that land somewhere in the middle. A mid-2023 change of CEO, from longtime chief Marty Flanagan to veteran Invesco executive Andrew Schlossberg, is noteworthy, and several other executives retired or departed in 2023. Portfolio-manager shuffles aimed at bolstering poor performers, which began under Flanagan, have continued under Schlossberg, who told Morningstar his most important aim is bolstering “investment quality.” However, major changes of direction or approach are unlikely. The firm retains a Morningstar Parent rating of Average. 
Invesco’s international-equity teams in Texas and New York remain solid. However, the extensive U.S.-equity lineup needs improvement. Fixed-income offerings run the gamut: The multisector and short-term-bond areas are good, but corporate high-yield is less impressive. The firm’s exchange-traded fund lineup includes the popular Nasdaq-focused QQQ; passive strategies make up around 37% of Invesco’s assets under management. Invesco has not been averse to trying new types of strategies, and it was among the firms that immediately launched a spot bitcoin ETF after SEC approval in early 2024.
The picture outside the United States is mixed. Fund performance has been subpar in Asia, and while the picture has brightened in the United Kingdom and Europe, that region still can’t be considered a strength.

Average

Parent

Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF

SPMV tracks an index of stocks selected from the S&P 500. Holdings are selected and weighted to create a low-volatility portfolio, subject to constraints.

ARK Innovation ETF

Avantis U.S. Small Cap Value ETF

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF

iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF

iShares Micro-Cap ETF

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF

iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF

iShares Russell Midcap ETF

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF

iShares Dow Jones U.S. ETF

Invesco QQQ

Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF

SPDR Portfolio Mid Cap ETF

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF

SPDR Portfolio Small Cap ETF

SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF

Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares

Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF

Invesco S&P 500 Enhanced Value ETF

The Federal Reserve kept rates steady and maintained a hawkish stance toward inflation while acknowledging an outstanding economy and progress in vanquishing inflationary pressure. Expectations for rate cuts in March were dampened by a change in statement language and Powell's comments in the press conference.

January FOMC Meeting Review: The 'Fed-Amental' Attribution Error

Flexshares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund

Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF

A recession may happen. Lowering your portfolio's beta can protect the huge gains you've racked up since Q1 2020. A way to do this is with low volatility ETFs. I'll present all 28 that I track, but will highlight three high-quality choices that don't get a lot of coverage.

Worried About A Recession? Try These 3 Cheap Low-Volatility ETFs

First Trust Capital Strength ETF

SPDR MFS Systematic Core Equity ETF

Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3x Shares

Impact Shares YWCA Women's Empowerment

The Large Cap Blend style ranks second in Q1'21. Based on an aggregation of ratings of 61 ETFs and 660 mutual funds in the Large Cap Blend style.

Best And Worst Q1 2021: Large Cap Blend ETFs And Mutual Funds

News for Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF ETF (SPMV)