We Doubt Intel Will Regain Its Former Dominance, but It Appears To Be on the Road to Recovery

Sector Director

Brian Colello

Revenue segments as reported by the company.

Client Computing

Data Center

Internet of Things

Mobileye

Other

Revenue Segments

Gross Profit, Operating Income, and Net Income as a percentage of Revenue

Gross Margin

Operating Margin

Profit Margin

Margins

An operating expense is an expense a business incurs through its normal business operations. Often abbreviated as OPEX.

SG&A

Restructuring & Other

Amortization of acquisition-related intangibles

Operating Expenses

Year over year growth in Revenue and Operating Expenses.

Revenue Y/Y

OpEx Y/Y

Growth

Shares outstanding refer to a company's stock currently held by all its shareholders, including share blocks held by institutional investors and restricted shares owned by the company's officers and insiders.

Outstanding Shares

Market Cap

Also known as Price/Sales Ratio. Calculated using Average market cap for the quarter / Annualized quarterly revenue.

Revenue Multiple

We expect Intel should remain the market share leader in central processing units, or CPUs, in PCs and servers for years to come. However, Intel’s best days are likely behind it, as it is at a chip manufacturing disadvantage against Taiwan Semiconductor, or TSMC, and its processor partners, such as AMD, Nvidia, and Apple. We think Intel’s aspirations to regain parity with TSMC is the right path forward but faces significant execution risk. Even if successful, Intel’s competitors will be stronger than when the firm was dominant a decade ago. In turn, we assign Intel a no-moat rating, a disappointing erosion from previous narrow- and wide-moat ratings.

We view Intel’s former dominance as stemming from two areas. First, its execution of Moore’s Law, which predicts transistor density on integrated circuits will double about every two years, meaning subsequent chips have substantial power, cost, and size improvements. In recent years, however, Intel was unable to keep pace. Intel’s second advantage comes from its control of x86, the instruction set for virtually the entire history of the PC. Microsoft’s Windows, Apple’s Mac operating system, and the software running on both platforms, was written with x86 processors in mind, which virtually guaranteed that all PC hardware would run on x86 processors. AMD was granted an x86 license but was a subpar second source for decades, and Intel thrived. Lately, however, AMD has forged a tight partnership with TSMC, and the duo has emerged as a credible second source to Intel, allowing AMD to gain market share in both PC and server CPUs. Even if Intel revives its manufacturing roadmap, we don’t foresee AMD recoiling from the market.

Demand for Intel’s CPUs will likely bottom out in 2023, but we don’t foresee a sharp recovery, either. Intel’s plans for five manufacturing nodes in four years (2022 to 2025) are aggressive and might not be achieved on time. Even if they are, there is no guarantee of a booming market for PC or server CPUs. Meanwhile, the market for artificial intelligence accelerators, such as Intel’s Gaudi products, should skyrocket, but we view Nvidia, and even AMD, as better positioned in the AI market.

Business Strategy & Outlook

We assign Intel a no-moat rating. The company’s returns on invested capital have fallen in recent years, and the firm did not earn excess returns on capital in 2022, nor do we expect it will do so in 2023. The deterioration stems from the firm’s manufacturing struggles and hefty investment phase in new manufacturing processes. We don’t believe the company will generate excess returns on capital in the next three to five years (even when considering government subsidies and other incentives). We are also not entirely confident in excess returns on capital looking five to 10 years out if its research and development (R&D) efforts are not successful, again given the capital-intensive nature of cutting-edge chip manufacturing. We acknowledge that, if Intel were to perfectly execute on its aggressive technological roadmap, it may warrant an economic moat rating in the future. Intel’s roadmap is on track currently, but the company has stumbled before, and we would like to see further progress before we award Intel with a narrow moat rating once again.

Intel’s chip design team has decades of experience in processor designs, mostly around central processing units, or CPUs, that, in our opinion, would likely warrant a narrow moat rating in isolation. However, we view the chip manufacturing business as being at a cost and technological disadvantage today, as the firm has stumbled and lost its lead to Taiwan Semiconductor, or TSMC, the world’s largest foundry. In our view, Intel’s manufacturing headwinds more than offset any competitive advantages that its chip design expertise may warrant.

Intel is perhaps best known for its CPUs for PC desktops and notebooks within its Client Computing Group (CCG) business segment. We think that Intel has a competitive advantage in PC CPU chip designs, not only because of chip design expertise honed over decades, but also because Intel is one of two prominent firms (along with AMD) to hold an x86 instruction set architecture license. 

Intel initially developed x86 in the 1970s and emerged as the instruction set required for IBM PCs and, later, Microsoft’s operating systems. Intel and AMD are the primary licensees of x86 and owners of x86 intellectual property, as they have a cross-licensing agreement that covers the x86 patent portfolio and would be terminated if either firm was acquired or had a change of control. The exclusivity of the x86 license serves as a significant barrier to entry for other chipmakers (such as Qualcomm, Apple, or others) that cannot make an x86 processor without a license.

For many years, effectively all PC software (including Microsoft’s Windows, Apple’s Mac operating systems, and any desktop software applications running on both operating systems) was designed for the x86 architecture. Software makers could not easily deviate from building x86-optimized applications, while Microsoft and Apple would have a heavy lift to convert their operating systems to alternate instruction sets (such as those by ARM, which is the dominant instruction set for mobile devices, used in processors from Qualcomm, Samsung, Apple’s iPhones, and others). In turn, Apple (for the Mac) and PC vendors (for Windows machines) had little choice than to buy x86 processors from (mostly) Intel or (on occasion) AMD to run their PCs.

Today, however, Apple has already done the heavy lifting of converting its Mac software to ARM and has now built excellent in-house processors for its Mac lineup. Further, an increasing portion of software is hosted in the cloud and can run on multiple operating systems and isn’t tied to only x86 devices. Microsoft has dabbled in ARM-based versions of Windows and may increase these investments over time. We still think it would be a heavy lift for any on-device software makers to port their software to be compatible with ARM-based PCs, but we think the writing is on the wall here to move such software to the cloud or on to ARM-based devices like the Mac. Thus, we don’t think the x86 architecture is as moaty as it once was, although we still foresee x86-based processors from Intel and AMD as making up a significant portion of the PC market for the next several years.

Intel also had a historical cost advantage in the PC processor market because of its manufacturing leadership along Moore’s Law, which was coined by one of Intel's chief founders, Gordon Moore, and suggests that the number of transistors per unit area doubles approximately every two years. For decades, Intel held a manufacturing advantage that drove PC hardware makers to buy Intel chips, which gave Intel a bigger R&D budget to invest in the next wave of chip innovations, thus coming out with even better processors and keeping the positive flywheel going. 

These dynamics have flipped in recent years, however, as Intel has stumbled in internal manufacturing and could no longer keep up with Moore’s Law. Meanwhile, AMD has partnered closely with TSMC, the world’s largest outsourced chip manufacturer or foundry. TSMC now has a market lead in making cutting edge chips, and AMD is bringing more competitive products to the PC market. Further, AMD has focused on a chiplet strategy with TSMC that is improving yields and flexibility, boosting AMD’s portfolio even further. In turn, AMD has gained market share over Intel in PCs in recent years. 

We view Intel’s cost disadvantage as the primary reason for our moat downgrades for Intel from wide to narrow and now to none. If Intel did not own fabs and instead outsourced production to a foundry like TSMC, it likely would have been far more profitable in 2022 and 2023 during the slowdown in PC demand. Some investors have called for Intel to go fabless, likely to break out the crown jewel chip design team. However, we consider this narrow moat design team as buried within a much larger, struggling, non-moaty manufacturing business. 

Intel is investing heavily in new process nodes to strive for manufacturing parity, if not leadership, with TSMC. If Intel is successful, it could regain some lost x86 PC market share. However, we no longer view AMD as an also-ran in PC CPUs, and even if Intel were to improve, we still think AMD could retain enough customers to maintain a healthy PC business. Further, the rise of ARM processor vendors represents an emerging threat that Intel did not face in its heyday a decade ago and earlier. 

In server CPUs within Intel’s Data Center and AI, or DCAI, segment, we see similar dynamics. Intel captured a dominant market position thanks to both x86 know-how and leading-edge manufacturing, but lost its edge on the latter front, allowing the AMD/TSMC partnership to gain credibility and market share in server CPUs. 

We also think that any cloud-based software vendors face high switching costs to move their software from x86 servers and on to ARM-based servers, although the switching costs are likely far lower between hosting software on an Intel x86 server versus an AMD one. Still, like the PC market, we see ARM-based processors as a threat, as Amazon, Nvidia, and others are developing ARM-based processors to run traditional server workloads as well as AI applications. Optimizing data center architectures and workloads for ARM-based servers, rather than x86 ones, is again a heavy lift, from what we can gather. Still, we recognize that mega-cap tech firms and cloud leaders (Microsoft, Apple, Amazon) may have the incentive to do so if they can use ARM-based processors to elevate their data centers and devices. Ultimately, we don’t foresee a mass exodus away from x86 architectures in the data center for the next several years.

Intel owns some other businesses and segments that hold valuable intangible assets around design expertise. Both Altera and Mobileye were narrow-moat companies when independent. However, 80% of Intel’s revenue comes from CCG and DCAI, and we foresee the PC and server CPU markets as driving Intel’s fate for the next few years. We view Intel’s current cost disadvantage as offsetting any chip design competitive advantages the firm may have in areas like Altera’s field programmable gate arrays, or FPGAs, Mobileye’s automotive products, or any semis developed for the communications infrastructure or networking end markets.

Longer term, Intel is building its foundry services business (IFS) from the ground up. Intel could conceivably carve out a moat here in the long run if it can again attain manufacturing process leadership, but it will be a highly capital-intensive initiative, so we’re not holding out hope for a moat in IFS just yet.

None

Economic Moat

Intel

Intel Corp. engages in the design, manufacture, and sale of computer products and technologies. It delivers computer, networking, data storage, and communications platforms. The firm operates through the following segments: Client Computing Group (CCG), Data Center Group (DCG), Internet of Things Group (IOTG), Non-Volatile Memory Solutions Group (NSG), Programmable Solutions (PSG), and All Other. The CCG segment consists of platforms designed for notebooks, 2-in-1 systems, desktops, tablets, phones, wireless and wired connectivity products, and mobile communication components. The DCG segment includes workload-optimized platforms and related products designed for enterprise, cloud, and communication infrastructure market. The IOTG segment offers compute solutions for targeted verticals and embedded applications for the retail, manufacturing, health care, energy, automotive, and government market segments. The NSG segment is composed of NAND flash memory products primarily used in solid-state drives. The PSG segment contains programmable semiconductors and related products for a broad range of markets, including communications, data center, industrial, military, and automotive. The All Other segment consists of results from other non-reportable segments and corporate-related charges. The company was founded by Robert Norton Noyce and Gordon Earle Moore on July 18, 1968, and is headquartered in Santa Clara, CA.

Earnings data Q3 2023

Revenue

Cost of revenue

Gross profit

Operating expenses

Operating income

EBITDA

Net income

Earnings per share

Total assets

Current assets

Cash & equivalents

Receivables

Inventory

Non-current assets

Net PPE

Intangibles

Total liabilities

Current liabilities

Short term debt

Income tax payable

Non-current liabilities

Long-term debt

Total equity

Stockholders equity

Minority interest

Total liabilities & equity

Total debt

Net debt

Book value per share

Cash from operations

Funds from operations

Change in working capital

Cash from investing

Capital expenditure

Purchase/sale of investments

Purchase/sale of business

Other sources

Cash from financing

Change in stock

Change in debt

Cash dividends paid

Cash from other sources

Net change in cash

Free cash flow

Intel Corp. engages in the design, manufacture, and sale of computer products and technologies. It delivers computer, networking, data storage, and communications platforms. The firm operates through the following segments: Client Computing Group (CCG), Data Center and AI (DCAI), Network and Edge (NEX), Mobileye, Accelerated Computing Systems and Graphics (AXG), Intel Foundry Services (IFS), and All Other. The CCG segment consists of platforms designed for notebooks, 2-in-1 systems, desktops, tablets, phones, wireless and wired connectivity products, and mobile communication components. The DCAI segment delivers solutions to cloud service providers and enterprise customers, along with silicon devices for communications service providers and high-performance computing customers. The NEX segment offers computing system solutions from inflexible fixed-function hardware to general-purpose compute, acceleration, and networking devices running cloud native software on programmable hardware. The Mobileye segment develops driving assistance and self-driving solutions. The AXG segment provides products and technologies designed to help customers solve the toughest computational problems. Its products include CPUs for high-performance computing and GPUs targeted for a range of workloads and platforms, from gaming and content creation on client devices to delivering media and gaming in the cloud, and the most demanding high-performance computing and AI workloads on supercomputers. The IFS segment refers to full stack solutions created from the foundry industry ecosystem. The All Other segment represents results from other non-reportable segments and corporate-related charges. The company was founded by Robert Norton Noyce and Gordon Earle Moore on July 18, 1968, and is headquartered in Santa Clara, CA.

Tower Semiconductor

A pending acquisition by Intel probably isn't a great reason to buy Tower Semiconductor. Tower is in the midst of a downturn, but if the industry rallies, Tower could rally with it.

Is Tower Semiconductor Stock a Buy Ahead of an Intel Acquisition Announcement?

Intel stock jumps after beating analyst estimates and guiding for a better-than-expected second half of 2023. The company's Q2 results show a recovery in margins and progress in addressing financial strain. Intel's CEO expresses confidence in the company's strategic priorities and expects sustained recovery in the PC market.

Intel: Back To Life (Rating Upgrade)

Advanced Micro Devices

AMD reported a double beat, but some investors were left unimpressed. Is AMD stock a buy now?

AMD Stock Earnings: Is This the Bottom, or Is Intel Taking Share?

Worldwide PC shipments continue to dwindle, even if there was a slight uptick between Q1 and Q2. The bulk of the PC market's growth over the next few years will stem from higher prices.

Before Buying Intel Stock Because of Q2's PC-Driven Earnings Beat

Oracle

Palantir Technologies

Artificial Intelligence is everywhere, shaping our futures. It will indeed change the way businesses operate, and the companies that invest in AI now will have full advantage.

3 Cheap AI Stocks That Smart Investors Will Snap Up Now

Carnival

Chipotle

Catalent

NVIDIA

Warner Bros Discovery Inc

Zions Bancorp

If you liked how S&P 500 stocks did in the first half, you'll love how the second half is starting. And some individual stocks are on fire.

7 Stocks Turn $10,000 Into $99,506 In 7 Months

Intel's Q2 numbers easily beat Wall Street's expectations. Its revenues, margins, and profits are rising sequentially again.

Where Will Intel Stock Be in 1 Year?

Intel (NASDAQ: INTC ) stock pleasantly surprised with its Q2 results, earning 13 cents per share on $12.9 billion revenue, with both lines beating expectations. The company put forward strong guidance for its Q3 earnings, expecting 20 cents per share in net income.

Intel Stock Predictions: Why INTC Could Double Up From Here

Nvidia's valuation is hard to justify, even with demand for AI chips booming. Intel can benefit from AI in multiple ways, including its own AI chips and its foundry business that could eventually make AI chips for others.

This Chip Stock Could Be Worth More Than Nvidia in 10 Years

Apple

Amgen

Ardelyx

Celsius Holdings

Coinbase

Cisco Systems

Chevron

DocGo

Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc

New Oriental Education & Technology Group

e.l.f. Beauty

Enphase Energy

Evolution Petroleum

Fluence Energy

FTC Solar

Genius Sports

GSX Techedu Inc.

Immunocore Holdings

Inter & Co Inc

JPMorgan Chase & Co

Coca-Cola

MoonLake Immunotherapeutics

Microsoft

Noble Corp PLC

Two new Breakout Stocks for Week 31 curated by the MDA model for 10% short-term upside and additional model selections. This week two of four picks gained over 10% in less than a week with peak gains in CLLS +16.8% AUTL+15.5% but the portfolio failed to hold gains. The streak of weekly picks gaining over 10% in less than a week has increased to 255 out of 322 trading weeks (79.2%) not including multiple gainers or warning signals.

August MDA Breakout Stocks Week 31 - 2023: High-Frequency Gainers To Give You An Edge

Intel reported another quarter of declining sales.

Should Investors Buy Intel Stock Right Now?

FAST Accelerator program to empower local startups and small/medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) AUSTIN, Texas , July 31, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- Flapmax, a leading artificial intelligence (AI) company, announced today its strategic partnership with Intel, the global technology leader, to foster AI innovation and drive economic empowerment in Africa. The collaboration will provide technology access, training, mentorship, and funding opportunities to entrepreneurs in emerging markets, starting with Africa, through the FAST Accelerator program.

Flapmax Partners with Intel to Accelerate AI Innovation in Africa

For years, Intel Corp.'s pain has been Advanced Micro Devices Inc. gain, as AMD has gained market share in central processing units amid Intel's missteps.

Is AMD ceding ground to Intel? Wall Street will soon find out

Adobe

DigitalOcean Holdings

5 AI Stocks Poised for Growth Without Sky-High Risk

Intense competition from AMD along with still-elevated inventory levels is slowing Intel's data center comeback. The AI boom is causing priorities to shift, further zapping demand for data center CPUs.

Intel's Data Center Downturn Drags On

Darden Restaurants

General Motors

GlaxoSmithKline

Restaurant Brands

Volkswagen AG

It's nice to own stocks that are well-positioned to rally and pay you for waiting for them to do so. That's especially true for older investors who want to buy stocks, and generate income.

If You Can Only Buy One Dividend Stock, It Better Be One of These 7 Names

After a brutal downturn, the PC market is set for a rebound. Supply chain inventory levels are largely back to normal.

The Worst Is Over for Intel's PC Business

Intel's AI accelerator pipeline has surpassed $1 billion. The company sells data center GPUs as well as its Gaudi line of AI chips.

Demand for Intel's AI Accelerators Is Exploding

Let's see if now is a good time to buy Intel or AMD stock this earnings season as the broader slowdown for chip stocks ends with the semiconductor realm boosted by artificial intelligence (AI).

Time to Buy Intel or AMD Stock as Chip Slowdown Ends?

Boeing

Procter & Gamble

Travelers

Verizon

Walgreens

The Dow Jones recovered from yesterday's selloff to gain 0.5% as investors hoped that slowing inflation would end Fed rate hikes.

Dow Jones Today: Index Rebounds on Slowing Inflation

Biogen

Cincinnati Financial

Ford Motor Company

U.S. equities rallied on Friday, July 28, 2023 after a report showing inflation cooled in June, and the S&P 500 rose 1%.

S&P 500 Gains and Losses Today: Stocks Jump as Inflation Cools

The major market indexes finished the week on a high note, boosted by strong earnings from blue chip stock Intel.

Stock Market Today: Stocks Rally Hard After Upbeat Inflation Data, Intel Earnings

Airbnb

DoorDash

DraftKings

Alphabet

Intuit

Roku

A slew of strong economic and earnings data points this week “could be the catalyst to send the market to new highs,” according to one strategist.

These Stocks Hit 2023 Highs As Dow Heads For Best 2-Month Stretch Since November

Intel stock has been a huge disappointment for long-term investors.

If You'd Put $1,000 Into Intel Stock 20 Years Ago, Here's What You'd Have Today

Analog Devices

Amazon

Cirrus Logic

Marvell Technology

QUALCOMM

Qorvo

Skyworks Solutions

AT&T

T-Mobile US

The best 5G stocks to invest in will change as smartphone apps, fixed broadband, enterprise services and the metaverse develop over time.

5G Stocks To Watch As Cloud, Enterprise Services Emerge

News for Intel Stock (INTC)