Halliburton Targets Stability in Notoriously Volatile U.S. Market to Deliver Profitable Growth

Analyst

Katherine Olexa

Revenue segments as reported by the company.

Services

Product sales

Revenue Segments

Gross Profit, Operating Income, and Net Income as a percentage of Revenue

Gross Margin

Operating Margin

Profit Margin

Margins

An operating expense is an expense a business incurs through its normal business operations. Often abbreviated as OPEX.

Impairments and other charges

General and administrative

SAP S4 upgrade expense

Operating Expenses

Year over year growth in Revenue and Operating Expenses.

Revenue Y/Y

OpEx Y/Y

Growth

Shares outstanding refer to a company's stock currently held by all its shareholders, including share blocks held by institutional investors and restricted shares owned by the company's officers and insiders.

Outstanding Shares

Market Cap

Also known as Price/Sales Ratio. Calculated using Average market cap for the quarter / Annualized quarterly revenue.

Revenue Multiple

Halliburton is one of the three largest oilfield service firms in the world, and it’s the largest pressure pumper in North America. The firm is renowned for its exceptional record of innovation, consistently developing novel ways to maximize value for its customers. 

We see challenges ahead for Halliburton, especially as the North American shale market grows increasingly competitive and profitability proves more difficult to maintain. Technological advances over the last several years have disseminated rather quickly among pressure pumpers, which reduces any one firm’s ability to maintain a competitive edge. In our view, Halliburton has risen to the occasion, as evidenced by its development of simultaneous fracturing, a method introduced by the firm in 2016 that’s essentially doubled the speed of well completions. We also think the industry’s push toward net-zero emissions presents opportunities in this space, and high demand for dual-fuel and electric fleets will allow Halliburton (as well as other providers of this next generation equipment) to command pricing premiums and longer-term contracts for the next several years. 

Regardless, the oil and gas production space is transforming in real time, as traditional oil and gas companies set their sights on broader energy applications in anticipation of a global shift away from a reliance on oil. Halliburton has astutely resolved to focus its attentions inward, maximizing profitability where it can and expanding to address international markets. We’re also encouraged by its emphasis on developing digital solutions for its clients, which we think represents the next frontier in production efficiency with the added benefit of its asset-light nature that will allow Halliburton to maximize value generation over time.

Business Strategy & Outlook

We award Halliburton a narrow moat. The firm maintains a competitive advantage thanks to its impressive intangible assets, composed of its robust patent portfolio and its considerable engineering expertise and experience, all of which contribute to the firm’s strong reputation among well operators, which facilitates contract wins over time. We also observe a cost advantage through economies of scale and scope. Halliburton’s formidable size and broad end-market exposure allow the firm to maximize the value-add from R&D investments by applying insights across service and product lines. The firm’s returns on invested capital have averaged 12% over the past 10 years, and we expect its ROIC will improve over the next five, reaching 23% by 2027. 

The completion and production segment represents about 57% of Halliburton’s total revenue and largely provides services for hydraulic fracturing, cementing, and artificial lift. It’s a historically strong performer—segment ROICs have averaged in the mid- to high teens over the past five years. Despite industrywide headwinds, including downward pricing pressure and a constant race for innovation, we’re optimistic Halliburton will continue to find ways to deliver value through its operational know-how and continued technological prowess. 

The vast majority of this segment’s revenue relies on pressure pumping services (nearly three quarters, according to data from Spears & Associates), and Halliburton has long held the dominant market share in this industry. On average, Halliburton handles roughly one fourth of all active frac spreads in North America. The firm has the most exposure to the Permian Basin, which represents roughly one third of its active frac spread capacity. Halliburton, Liberty Energy, and ProPetro together control over half the Permian pressure pumping market, and the remaining half is highly fragmented. The relative market concentration in and of itself affords Halliburton a degree of pricing power relative to other, more fragmented markets, where rampant product commoditization puts significant downward pricing pressure on oilfield service firms. The Permian Basin also features geological characteristics that make it particularly suitable to simultaneous fracturing, a completions method introduced by Halliburton in 2016. Rystad indicates that in 2020, simultaneous-fracturing completions were 60% faster than the more widely implemented zipper fracking method, resulting in 5%-7% cost reductions for well operators. Halliburton can therefore charge a slight pricing premium for its services, because the cost savings make well operators—which are highly cost-sensitive—more amenable to a higher service charge.

The evident efficiency gains from simultaneous fracturing have spurred enthusiastic adoption of the method, representing 8% of total well completions at the end of 2020, compared with just 1% in 2018. That being said, simultaneous fracturing doesn’t make economic sense everywhere. It requires about 50% more equipment on a well pad, and not all basins feature sufficient pad density to support the requisite equipment intensity. The majority of simultaneous-fracturing operations therefore take place in the Permian, where Halliburton again maintains particularly strong market share. 

The Haynesville shale play is another valuable end market for Halliburton. It represents roughly 15% of Halliburton’s total active frac spread capacity, and the firm handles roughly half of the fracking operations in the region. The Haynesville shale play is significantly more concentrated than other markets: Rystad data indicates just five pressure pumpers maintain operations in the region. It also features more complex wells, making it the most frack-intensive play in the U.S. These two factors together create stickier customer relationships and convey more pricing power to service providers relative to other regions in North America. Haynesville is also in much closer proximity to frac sand mines than other regions. Management indicates that transportation expenses account for more than 50% of frac sand costs, so any reductions in distance traveled can garner cost savings (and in such a highly cost-competitive industry, any savings are impactful). We expect this cost advantage will prove particularly valuable in the near term as strong demand for frac sand pushes prices ever higher. Increasing simultaneous-fracturing adoption will exacerbate matters, since its higher equipment requirements also apply to frac sand. Prices will remain high until frac sand providers can introduce adequate capacity to restore the supply/demand balance (around 2023 year-end at the earliest, according to Rystad). 

The advent of simultaneous fracturing solidifies Halliburton’s reputation as an innovator in oilfield services and strengthens its value proposition toward well operators that consistently seek to maximize operational efficiency. Oilfield service providers are in a constant race toward the technological leading edge in order to drive efficiency gains that win contracts with well operators. The result has been rapid dissemination of technological advancements that have significantly reduced well costs over time. It appeared for a while that the most impactful developments had already been realized, but Halliburton’s solutions indicate there may be more runway for innovation than previously assumed. We expect competitors will implement simultaneous-fracturing solutions of their own, which may erode some of Halliburton’s competitive advantage over time, but several other industry developments present opportunities for the firm to protect its position as the lead innovator in pressure pumping and beyond. 

Next-generation equipment such as electric frac spreads, or e-fracs, and dual-fuel frac spreads represent the current technological leading edge in pressure pumping, and Halliburton is positioned to take significant market share. Next-generation frac fleets are in particularly high demand by well operators seeking to minimize wellsite emissions wherever possible. By our estimate, next-generation fleets can confer cost savings to well operators in excess of $100,000 per month, and their potential cost-effectiveness only increases when diesel or gas prices are high. These savings are even after accounting for the hefty price premiums these next-generation fleets can command compared with traditional diesel fleets—10%-15% for dual-fuel fleets, and 20% for e-fracs, according to Rystad. E-fracs and dual-fuel fleets currently operate at maximum capacity, which we expect will persist for the next few years. Several service firms intend to introduce additional capacity over the next few years, but it will take quite a bit of time and investment before available capacity can erode price premiums, which will protect Halliburton’s moat for some time. Halliburton is investing in infrastructure development so more well operations can support e-fleets, however, which will support continued industry growth over time. Service firms aren’t rushing to launch large fleets of these at once; despite the numerous advantages provided by these next-generation fleets, the frac equipment market remains oversupplied. Furthermore, the service industry has learned from the overexuberant investment in the 2010s that caused the rampant rig overcapacity today. Service firms have by and large indicated they won’t build new fleets without first receiving a contract from a well operator (which also tends to be longer term to ensure adequate return on investment). Dual-fuel conversions can cost around $10 million, while e-frac conversions can be as high as $60 million per fleet. In our view, the high capital investment required for upgrades may create barriers to entry for smaller players. It's worth noting that Halliburton’s largest competitors like Liberty Energy and ProFrac are actively upgrading their fleets, but we think the expense associated with upgrades plus the time required for fleet conversions will keep industry conversions slow enough to protect pricing premiums for next-generation equipment over the next few years. 

The other portion of Halliburton’s business falls into the drilling and evaluation segment, which has averaged 16% ROICs over the past five years. We don’t see as much of a competitive advantage from technological prowess in this segment, as rampant product commoditization leaves little room for technological differentiation, leaving Halliburton and peers to compete almost entirely on price. Furthermore, Halliburton often holds a distant second, or even third, place to Schlumberger and Baker Hughes in nearly every product line. Nevertheless, the portfolio diversification contributed by this segment allows Halliburton to leverage its innovations across the company, maximizing the return on its R&D dollars and strengthening its overall cost advantage. 

We see evidence of this in the drilling and completion fluids product line, which features several products used in pressure pumping, where Halliburton is known for driving innovation. It’s this segment’s strongest product line by far, generally representing about 30% of total segment revenue. Schlumberger and Halliburton have enjoyed a relative duopoly in this market since at least 2008, each controlling roughly 25% of the market, and share falls off dramatically thereafter (the third-largest player’s share is below 10%, according to data from Spears & Associates). 

The drilling and evaluation segment is much more globally diversified, as well, which can at times mitigate adverse impacts from cyclicality, which is typical of the oil and gas market. The North American oil and gas market tends to be highly volatile, as well operators are typically very quick to adjust operations in response to changes in oil and gas prices. International (excluding U.S.) markets, on the other hand, still cycle with oil and gas prices, but tend to be significantly less sensitive to price cycles. The larger proportion of national oil companies entails significantly more government-contracted projects in international markets, which tend to adopt a longer-term view. The firm no longer breaks out segment revenue by geography, but we expect roughly two thirds of drilling and evaluation revenue comes from international markets, compared with roughly one third in the completion and production segment. The impact is noticeable—following the significant activity declines in 2020, completion and production revenue fell by one half compared with 2019, while drilling and evaluation revenue fell by less than a quarter. Halliburton still maintained excess returns in 2020, but if its drilling and evaluation segment held similar geographic exposures to the completion and production segment, we estimate ROICs could have dropped below 1%. 

Overall, Halliburton maintains a strong business that’s resilient during downturns and continues to contribute meaningful innovations in an industry where technological differentiation is difficult to attain, let alone maintain. We expect the firm’s strong market share in several core competencies coupled with its reputation for continually adding value for its customers will ensure the firm generates excess returns for at least the next 10 years.

Narrow

Economic Moat

Halliburton

Halliburton Co. engages in the provision of services and products to the energy industry related to the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas. It operates through the following segments: Completion and Production and Drilling and Evaluation. The Completion and Production segment delivers cementing, stimulation, intervention, pressure control, specialty chemicals, artificial lift and completion services. The Drilling and Evaluation segment provides field and reservoir modeling, drilling, evaluation and wellbore placement solutions that enable customers to model, measure and optimize their well construction activities. The company was founded by Erle P. Halliburton in 1919 and is headquartered in Houston, TX.

Earnings data Q1 2024

Revenue

Cost of revenue

Gross profit

Operating expenses

SG&A

Other

Operating income

EBITDA

Net income

Earnings per share

Total assets

Current assets

Cash & equivalents

Receivables

Inventory

Non-current assets

Net PPE

Intangibles

Total liabilities

Current liabilities

Short term debt

Income tax payable

Non-current liabilities

Long-term debt

Total equity

Stockholders equity

Minority interest

Total liabilities & equity

Total debt

Net debt

Book value per share

Cash from operations

Funds from operations

Change in working capital

Cash from investing

Capital expenditure

Purchase/sale of investments

Purchase/sale of business

Other sources

Cash from financing

Change in stock

Change in debt

Cash dividends paid

Cash from other sources

Net change in cash

Free cash flow

Halliburton Co. engages in the provision of services and products to the energy industry related to the exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. It operates through the Completion and Production, and Drilling and Evaluation segments. The Completion and Production segment delivers cementing, stimulation, intervention, pressure control, specialty chemicals, artificial lift, and completion services. The Drilling and Evaluation segment provides field and reservoir modeling, drilling, evaluation, and wellbore placement solutions that enable customers to model, measure, and optimize their well construction activities. The company was founded by Erle P. Halliburton in 1919 and is headquartered in Houston, TX.

Halliburton Co (NYSE: HAL) reported first-quarter FY22 revenue growth of 24.1% year-over-year to $4.28 billion, beating the consensus of $4.21 billion. Completion and Production revenue increased 25.8% Y/Y to $2.35 billion, and the corresponding operating income increased by 17.5% Y/Y to.

Halliburton's Q1 Results Surpass Expectations

Halliburton's first-quarter earnings beat estimates but the stock is tumbling. It has risen about 82% this year.

Halliburton Beats Earnings Estimates. But the Stock Is Falling.

Shares of Halliburton Co. HAL, +2.16% fell 2.0% in premarket trading Tuesday, to pull back from a 3 1/2-year high in the previous session, even after the oil services company reported first-quarter profit and revenue that rose just above expectations. Net income rose to $263 million, or 29 cents a share, from $170 million, or 19 cents a share, in the year-ago period.

Halliburton's stock pulls back even after profit, revenue rise to top expectations

Halliburton Co posted a rise in first-quarter adjusted profit on Tuesday as a rally in crude prices boosted demand for its oilfield services and equipment.

Halliburton profit rises as strong crude prices boost drilling demand

HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Halliburton Company (NYSE: HAL) announced today net income of $263 million, or $0.29 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2022. This compares to net income for the first quarter of 2021 of $170 million, or $0.19 per diluted share. Adjusted net income for the first quarter of 2022, excluding impairments and other charges and a loss on the early extinguishment of debt, was $314 million, or $0.35 per diluted share. Halliburton's total revenue for the first quarter

Halliburton Announces First Quarter 2022 Results

The shares of Halliburton have almost doubled in value since the beginning of the year, pushed by surging benchmark oil & gas prices and the geopolitical uncertainty associated with the Russia-Ukraine war. However, the rig count figures in North America remain 20% lower than pre-pandemic levels.

Are Investors Too Optimistic On Halliburton Stock?

Halliburton (HAL) is seeing favorable earnings estimate revision activity and has a positive Zacks Earnings ESP heading into earnings season.

Is a Surprise Coming for Halliburton (HAL) This Earnings Season?

Johnson & Johnson

Lockheed Martin

Before markets opened Wednesday, JPMorgan beat a modest revenue estimate and missed on profits.

Earnings Previews: Halliburton, Johnson & Johnson, Lockheed Martin, Truist

Higher drilling-associated activities are likely to have boosted Halliburton's (HAL) profit levels in the first quarter.

Halliburton (HAL) Headed for Strong Q1 Earnings: Know Why

Affirm

EPAM Systems

Mosaic

Ovintiv

Occidental Petroleum

UiPath

Roblox

Rivian Automotive

By Aman Jain Q1 2022 wasn't the best of times for U.S. stocks. Overall, the stock market declined in Q1 owing to a number of reasons, including Russia's invasion of Ukraine and record-high inflation.

These Were the 5 Best and 5 Worst Performing Large-Cap Stocks in Q1 2022

Halliburton has an actionable upside story internationally and through an expanded technology platform.

Halliburton: Buy For The Long-Term

Halliburton: Great Energy Play

Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund

Oil prices have come back down, but energy stocks have not. It is a bullish sign.

3 Energy Stocks Gushing Higher

Antero Resources

Chevron

The current oil and gas environment is conducive to these energy giants.

Why Chevron, Halliburton, and Antero Resources Stocks Jumped in March and Continue to Rally

APA Corporation

Despite yesterday's slide, geopolitical tensions and a solid demand picture are providing a tailwind for oil prices. Consequently, energy companies like OXY, HAL and APA have seen solid gains this year.

Were SPR Talks the Main Culprit Behind Oil's Steep Decline?

Baker Hughes Co

Marathon Oil

Let's take a deep look into the S&P 500's top sector of the first quarter of 2022 - Energy - and its high flyers Occidental Petroleum (OXY), Halliburton (HAL), APA Corporation (APA), Marathon Oil (MRO) and Baker Hughes (BKR).

S&P 500's Q1 Energy Winners: Will the Growth Story Continue?

Schlumberger

Chart Industries

Liberty Oilfield Services

Soaring crude oil prices have hit consumers hard over the past month or so. The combined effects of higher demand for energy, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and the reluctance of producers to increase the flow of crude have sent U.S.

Wells Fargo Shuffles Ratings, Targets on 6 Oilfield Services Firms

London-based Energean hires Halliburton (HAL) for carbon storage subsurface study in Greece.

Halliburton (HAL) Recruited by Energean for Greece Project

The Zacks Style Scores offers investors a way to easily find top-rated stocks based on their investing style. Here's why you should take advantage.

Why Halliburton (HAL) is a Top Momentum Stock for the Long-Term

ConocoPhillips

Devon Energy

Hess

Exxon Mobil

Prices of oil, wheat, gold, and other commodities have soared since Russia's attack on Ukraine last month.

The 'new FANG' trade will be in commodities amid market turmoil sparked by Russia's war in Ukraine, says wealth manager

HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Halliburton Company (NYSE: HAL) today announced Energean, an independent E&P company focused on developing resources in the Mediterranean and the North Sea, awarded it a study to assess carbon storage potential of the Prinos basin in Greece. Halliburton carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) experts will collaborate with Energean to evaluate the Prinos area's carbon dioxide (CO2) storage complex. The scope of work will include long-term plume modeling, char

Energean Selects Halliburton for Carbon Storage Subsurface Study in Greece

International sanctions have made it difficult for oilfield service providers Halliburton (HAL) and Schlumberger (SLB) to conduct operations in Russia.

Why are Halliburton, Schlumberger Pulling Back from Russia?

The two oil giants respectively announced in news releases on Friday that they were "immediately" suspending operations in Russia.

Halliburton and Schlumberger, two of the world's largest oilfield service companies, are suspending operations in Russia

Halliburton Co. HAL, +0.42% said late Friday it has suspended future business in Russia as it complies with sanctions following the invasion of Ukraine. "Halliburton will prioritize safety and reliability as we wind down our remaining operations in Russia," the oilfield services company said in a statement.

Halliburton winding down Russian operations

HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Halliburton Company (NYSE: HAL) today announced it immediately suspended future business in Russia as the Company complies with sanctions that prohibit transactions and work, including for certain state-owned Russian customers. Halliburton will prioritize safety and reliability as we wind down our remaining operations in Russia. Several weeks ago, the Company halted all shipments of specific sanctioned parts and products to Russia. Halliburton has no active joint ventu

News for Halliburton Stock (HAL)